Wednesday, December 3, 2008

Queensland Government endorces fire sales of repossessed homes, in a backhanded way.

Sometimes we hear stories of where people have had a series of bad events occur and have got behind with their repayments, and usually instead of going to their lender and trying to sort out something, they put in in the too hard basket and pay it when they can which doesn't impress the lender very much.

Don't forget that to supply you with the money you borrowed for your property, that lender probably also borrowed that money and like you they also need to pay it back.

However, we also hear stories about properties that have been repossessed going to auction and barely getting the amount owed, leaving the borrower with out the equity they were due, and in some cases we also hear that someone associated with the lender may have been the buyer, true or not.

This Government has just legitimised the practice of fire sales of repo properties because if caught it will attract a $20,000 fine, which to the skeptic means that at auction the buyer will pay what is owed plus the amount of the fine, I can't see any lender hanging around waiting for 6 to 12 months to get the real value of a repo, can you ?



The Bligh Government will fast-track new legislation this week to protect struggling Queensland home-owners from mortgagee fire sales.

Under the new laws, financial institutions that intentionally sell repossessed properties at below the market value - leaving home owners with little or no equity - could face fines of up to $20,000.

Premier Anna Bligh said mortgage stress was becoming an increasing reality for Queensland families and she was committed to delivering this protection before Christmas.

"More and more Queenslanders are doing it really tough," Ms Bligh said.

"The current financial climate is squeezing household budgets to the limit, many to a point where they cannot pay their mortgage.

"The latest data from Fitch Ratings shows an increase in mortgage stress across Australia, with Helensvale on the Gold Coast the most mortgage stressed suburb in the country.

"Applications made to Queensland courts for repossession of real estate has increased dramatically in recent months, jumping from 374 from March-June to 606 in the last four months - and while it's not possible to say what the circumstances were in each of these cases, the figures are sobering.

"The only thing worse than the prospect of losing your home is the concern that your financial institution could sell your property quickly and at below market value just to cover outstanding debts - leaving you with nothing.

"Swift action is needed and my Government will deliver the protection these vulnerable Queenslanders need by Christmas," she said.

Attorney-General Kerry Shine said the Property Law Act 1974 would be amended to extend the obligation to sell at market value to situations where properties are sold under a power of attorney or by receivers.

"Mortgagees in Queensland who exercise a power to sell property are currently required to comply with section 85 of the Act that requires they 'take reasonable care to ensure that the property is sold at market value," Mr Shine said.

"These new laws will extend this protection and introduce tough, new requirements under this section, including:

1. a requirement to adequately advertise the sale; and

2. obtaining reliable evidence of the property's value; and

3. maintaining the property, including making any reasonable repairs; and

4. selling the property by auction, unless it is appropriate to sell it in another way.

"Any mortgagee or receiver that fails to follow these requirements will face fines of up to $20,000.

"These steps are designed to ensure mortgagees don't seek a quick and easy solution when a repossession occurs and rush through with a sale under market value.

.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Does this apply to Councils selling people's homes when a measley 3 or 4 thousand is owed?
Can't get away from the vultures can we?

Anonymous said...

This will be another cost the poor person who has their home sold out from under them has to bear because the real estate who does the selling for the Government / council will probably add this into the costs so the original owner who is already under financial pressure will be burned again, this time by a State Government rule.